Sounds reasonable to me. I should point out that 1) rune armor is going to require 50 defence in the eoc, and 2) I haven't seen any armor (including boots/gloves) with offensive stats, and unless they change their minds on this point I doubt the berserker helm will be any different, and it will probably be inferior to the rune full helm.
You're also unlikely to see a player with 60 defence in the wilderness. Dragon armor is too expensive to risk, and the extra defence levels don't help much unless you can wear the better armor to take advantage of it.
You're also unlikely to see a player with 60 defence in the wilderness. Dragon armor is too expensive to risk, and the extra defence levels don't help much unless you can wear the better armor to take advantage of it.
"The only thing an adult can give a child is a yellow cape." - Chuck Jones