2012-07-01 19:46:33
I eagerly await the challenge, Stan
Forgot to respond to the double numbering, sorry. I think *officially* it should be like 4), 4), 6) and it makes a bit more sense logically like Dave says.. But both ways have their reasoning, sorry for bringing it up now
0
Forgot to respond to the double numbering, sorry. I think *officially* it should be like 4), 4), 6) and it makes a bit more sense logically like Dave says.. But both ways have their reasoning, sorry for bringing it up now